The Fact of PCR Test

Writer By Tommy Black Crow

"Hope to Spread This Blog Out Around the World"

Hi. This time, I am going to publish the fact of the PCR medical check. These days, the number of infected people with the Wuhan virus is still increasing. Many of them have no symptoms of the Wuhan virus. The infected younger people tend to spread the virus out to their families and other people without knowing. Compared to infected elderly people, they tend to pass away due to the virus. The Japanese government is still discussing if they are going to cancel the 2020 Tokyo Olympics or not. 

Refer to this blog: Tomoyuki Aso's Blog: Analyzing for Wuhan Coronavirus. (asotomoyuki.blogspot.com)

The Introduction of the PCR Test

The PCR check stands for the Polymerase Chain Reaction test. This is a diagnostic test that determines if you are infected by analyzing a sample to see if it contains genetic material from the virus. This test was invented by the American biochemist Kary Mullis at Cetus Corporation. 

What is a PCR test? | COVID-19 test | Coronalab.eu

Polymerase chain reaction - Wikipedia

The Fact of the PCR Test

Dr. Kary Mullis explains that the PCR test was not designed to detect any type of infectious disease. It was created to find out the signature of DNA and RNA of the person being tested. Therefore, the PCR test was not designed to discover any type of virus and was just developed to pick up the DNA and RNA of the person being tested. In other words, there is no method to make sure if anyone is infected by the Wuhan virus or not in human technology yet. Therefore, no one is sure if they are truly infected by the Wuhan virus or not at all. In addition, the PCR test causes a false positive for the Wuhan virus, and causes the false-negative for the Wuhan virus once in a while; however, he coincidentally passed away in August last year before it was the pandemic of the Wuhan virus.

The inventor of PCR never said it wasn’t designed to detect infectious diseases - Full Fact 

The Fact of the PCR Test II

Ethan Huff who is a writer in BOMBSHELL reveals that testing data from Massachusetts, New York, Nevada, and elsewhere show that upwards of 90 percent of people who test positive for the Wuhan coronavirus are not infected by the Wuhan virus. There are people who have false positives for the Wuhan virus among the people who include truly the positive for the Wuhan virus. That's why infected people with the Wuhan virus are still increasing every single day due to the false positive for it. In addition, mainstream media persuades people to stay at home and inject a vaccine. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention complain that false positives are a serious issue and report mistakenly to public health agencies; however, the truth is that the PCR tests are a problem to increase the number of infected people for the Wuhan virus. The more the PCR tests are the more the number of infected people and a problem is increasing every day. The PCR tests and mass media are leading to medical collapse, lockdown, and stay-at-home. Ethan Huff also describes that despite millions upon millions of people are healthy people receiving false-positive test results for the Wuhan virus, most of them are still being fooled by the plandemic and the PCR test. PCR test is the same as the shitty voting machine which is called "Dominion". The PCR test might be reaching the top 3 of the most useless system. The first is the PCR test. The second is Dominion. The third is mainstream media. Ethan Huff criticizes that It is the biggest scum that made some people rich; however, more than 85 million PCR tests administered in the US since the outbreak of the Wuhan virus began dominating the mainstream media as a result test kit manufacturers and testing lab earned 13 billion dollars in profits. Why don't you take care of poverty people with 13 billion dollars by donating to them? While people are in a panic to choose stay-at-home and lockdown or not, wealthy people and people who engaged in the test kit manufacturers and testing lab facilities earned 13 billion dollars by administering the PCR test in the US. On the other hand, there were some people who suffered from the false-positive for the Wuhan virus. Ethan Huff explains that more than seven million Americans who received a fake positive test result are presumably believed to carry the dreaded Chinese virus to their families, co-workers, and other people. Some of them were faced with depression, job loss, isolation, simply fear and worry that possibly led to other health issues. Some workers were stolen their life and job and got caught in mental illness or depression because of fake-positive for the Wuhan virus. The infected people who have positive for the Wuhan virus without symptoms might be caught in a fake-positive.   

BOMBSHELL: Up to 90% of COVID-19 “positive” test results are false, test kits matching dead viral fragments that pose no infection risk (falseflag.news)

The Fact of the PCR Test III

Kit Knightly who is a writer in Off-Guardian reveals that the World Health Organization also released a guidance memo on December 14th to warn that if the PCR tests have high cycle thresholds, it will result in a false positive for the Wuhan virus. Therefore, the WHO admitted there is a fake positive for the Wuhan virus in the PCR tests. The inventor of the PCR tests Dr. Kary Mullis explains that CT value is higher than 40 cycles to amplify simple-copy gene, there is something wrong with the PCR. The higher the CT value is the more people who receive a positive for the Wuhan virus are. Kit Knightly also reveals that many labs around the world were using PCR tests with CT value over 35 and was lower than 40. Therefore, the WHO planned to increase the number of people who received a fake-positive for the Wuhan virus by adjusting a CT value and ordered all labs to set CT values to over 35 and was lower than 40 to inflate the number of positives. Finally, Kit Knightly explains that the WHO decided to set CT value from 25 to 30 cycles instead of over 35 cycles after all positives injected the vaccine for the Wuhan virus. The PCR test is a fraud machine that can create fake positives by highering and lowering a CT value.  

WHO (finally) admits PCR tests create false positives – OffGuardian (off-guardian.org) 

 

Because I found another fact of the PCR test, I am going to introduce this second movie. The second movie is that Tanzanian president John Magufli took samples from a goat, sheep, pawpaw, car oil, and so on to the laboratory secretly. Car oil was negative for the Wuhan virus. A jackfruit or durian was inconclusive. Pawpaw came back positive for the Wuhan virus. Therefore, the pawpaw juice was positive for the Wuhan virus. Kware or a bird type also was positive for the Wuhan virus. A rabbit was undetermined for the Wuhan virus. A goat was negative for the Wuhan virus, but the sample from the goat was positive for the virus. When it comes to discovering this movie, anyone will be able to be infected by the Wuhan virus or positive for the Wuhan virus even if you do not wear masks. In addition, everyone might be questioning that "Is PCR test suitable for detecting the Wuhan virus"? Coincidentally, Tanzanian president John Magufuli passed away on March 17th this year because of heart failure.       

Questions

Was he killed by the dark side or DS? Why did he have to pass away? Was there a reason why he was not allowed to be alive? Was there a disadvantageous truth of the PCR test? If his explanation should be false, it is enough to bring evidence to disprove it, isn't it? Is it too weird that the inventor of the PCR test passed away? Why did the WHO admit that the PCR test can create a fake positive for the Wuhan virus suddenly in December last year? Is the PCR test related to the 2020 US Presidential election? Is it the first priority to remove the PCR test to prevent society, citizens, and medical collapse and get back to a peaceful life ahead of refusing to inject the vaccine for the Wuhan virus? Why did John Magfuli pass away after he published this movie? Was he assassinated? Why did not mass media broadcast the movie of his accusation? Was there proof to prove that his accusation was wrong or unproven? If his accusation should have been really unproven, was it enough to show some evidence to disprove his accusation instead of making him dead? Was it weird that John Magufli passed away after the movie of his accusation was published on Youtube? 

Conclusion and Suggestion   

That is all about this blog. Be sure to keep in mind that PCR tests can create fake positives for the Wuhan virus to guide us to stay-at-home, lockdown, and medical collapse by highering and lowering CT value. If you want to prevent these crises seriously and decrease positives and fake positives for the Wuhan virus, why don't you persuade your family, co-workers, and your neighborhoods to remove the PCR test to get back to a peaceful life?  I'd appreciate it if you read my blog to understand the reason why the positives for the Wuhan virus are still increasing every single day and to spread my blog out around the world. See you next time!!

Strange Phenomenon of Biden's Inauguration.

Writer By Tommy Black Crow.

Joe Biden was the 46th US president; however, many Internet users state that his inauguration ceremony was the recording. This time, I'm going to introduce a couple of the strange phenomenon of Biden's inauguration that they found. I publish this movie to discover the strange phenomenon of his inauguration. I'd appreciate it if you understand my reason even if you dislike Joe Biden. 

The First Phenomenon

The first phenomenon of Biden's inauguration is about the weather on January 20th. I saw that it was cloudy in Washington DC on that day on TV; however, it was clearly sunny when it was his inauguration. You should ask Mako Ganaha who is a Japanese journalist to answer a question just in case. The question is that was it cloudy in Washington DC on the morning of January 20th? since she has been there on that day. Because it is not credible that Biden's inauguration was recording even if I introduce the first phenomenon. Let's move on to the second phenomenon. 

Be sure to pay attention to the morning of January 20th: 

Past Weather in Washington DC, USA — Yesterday or Further Back (timeanddate.com)

The Second Phenomenon

The second phenomenon is about the fences and state militaries. Much conservative news broadcasted that Donald Trump decided to set 25 thousand US soldiers and into Washington DC until the end of January and get surrounded by fences. Currently, from the five thousand at least to seven thousand at the most of the US military soldiers are still remaining in the Whitehouse until the end of February since the governor of Texas, Florida, and New Hampshire decided to retreat their soldiers from the Whitehouse due to Biden's unrespect of the US soldiers. Also, many US soldiers turn back against Joe Biden. Therefore, they don't respect him. In other words, it is none of their business even if Joe Biden will be impeached. 

The Third Phenomenon

The last one is about the two ladies in pink and white when Joe Biden is about to swear in the 46th US president. This is the biggest paragraph in this blog. When I found the third phenomenon, I was sure that Biden's inauguration was the recording. You can go at 6:00:00 for the movie. Be sure to pay attention to the two ladies in pink and white and Korean American security bodyguard David Cho who works as the US bodyguard for 18 years when Joe Biden is about to swear into the 46th US president. You should be able to discover the strange phenomenon. When I noticed this phenomenon, Were they ghosts? Where have they been when Joe Biden was about to swear into the 46th US president? 

   

Conclusion

That's all about my blog. You should ask Ganaha Mako on her account on Youtube to answer three questions. The one is that "was it cloudy in Washington DC in the morning of January 20th?" The two is that "Did you see fences and the US state soldiers in Washington DC on that day?" The three is that "Did you hear Lady Gaga's voice while she was singing the US anthem on that day?" I've heard that the date of the true inauguration is March 4th. Many people wish Donald Trump could come back to the presidential job and get arrested devils who were involved in voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election. Otherwise, communism is going to cover and dominate the earth for a long time while no one is still knowing. Therefore, people are going to murder, loot, and burn people for their money. The Democrats and patriots of the US might or should be preparing for the red purge to protect their freedom from a red tentacle. I'd appreciate it if you read my blog and support it. Thank you.    

The Method to Prove that the 2020 US Presidential Election was Voter Fraud Easily.

Writer by Tommy Black Crow

"Hope to Spread this Blog Out Around the World"

In this blog, I'm going to teach you to prove that the 2020 presidential election was voter fraud. I'm going to list evidence for voter fraud for the 2020 presidential election. I'd appreciate it if you download a PDF from this URL to read them and spread them out around the World. However, I found a method to prove that the 2020 presidential election was a cheating election easily even if you will do my favors. Do you know what the method is? The method is Benford's law. Gold Well Walks. investigated the 2020 presidential election according to Benford's law. 

Supporting Files.zip (dropbox.com)  

What Is Benford's Law?

Before I'm going to move on to the main paragraph, I'm going to explain Benford's law by summarizing it. Benford's law is an observation about the frequency distribution of leading digits in many real-life sets of numerical data. The law was named by Frank Benford who was an American physicist and started it. Researchers used the law to evaluate possible fraud in the release of COVID-19 numbers for example total and daily confirmed cases and deaths. When you set that obey the law, the number 1 appears as the leading significant digit about 30% of the time while 9 appears as the leading significant digit less than 5% of the time. 

Benford's law - Wikipedia

The Basic of Benford's Law

Before you are about to watch this video, I'd like you to keep in your mind that a red line is the percentage of Benford's law. If a blue line is close to the red line, there was no cheating in the election; however, it would be possible that someone modified the result of the election if the blue line is far away from the red line. I'd like you to go at 8:00 minutes to pay attention to Biden's graph because this is the main of this blog. Gold Well Walks. investigated one survey of the population in Japan, two elections in Japan, the 2016 US presidential election, and the 2020 US presidential election according to Benford's law. Please refer to the percentages of these numbers.

• The number 1 appears as the leading significant digit 30.1% of the time.
• The number 2 shows up as the leading significant digit 17.6% of the time.
• The number 3 comes out as the leading significant digit 12.5% of the time.
• The number 4 shows up as the leading significant digit 9.7% of the time.
• The number 5 emerges as the leading significant digit 7.9% of the time.
• The number 6 appears as the leading significant digit 6.7% of the time.
• The number 7 comes out as the leading significant digit 5.8% of the time.
• The number 8 emerges as the leading significant digit 5.1% of the time.
• The number 9 appears as the leading significant digit 4.6% of the time.

The most important thing is that there is a place you need to cut somewhere since the number of numbers to be targeted is not infinite. You use infinity when it is mathematics; however, there is no infinity in the current society. 

Another important thing is that the numbers handled are random for instance the length of a river is random but the number of rivers isn't random. The numbers in this World follow Benford's law.  

The Investigation of the Population in Japan and the Japanese Elections.

In the case of the Population in Japan.

You can go to 5:25 minutes. A blue line is a percentage of the population in Japan. It almost matches Benford's line. In other words, someone didn't modify the result of this survey. If the blue line deviates from the red line, the original number in this survey is not random and it might be possible that someone modified the result of this survey or elections. As you can see in this graph, you are able to understand if someone modified the voting in an election or not. 

• The percentage of number 1 is 31%.
• The percentage of number 2 is 16%. 
• The percentage of number 3 is 13%.
• The percentage of number 4 is 10%.
• The percentage of number 5 is 8%.
• The percentage of number 6 is 6%.
• The percentage of number 7 is 6%.
• The percentage of number 8 is 5%.
• The percentage of number 9 is 4%.

In the case of the 2020 Tokyo Governor Election.

This part is the case of the 2020 Tokyo governor election. 

• The percentage of number 1 is 31%.
• The percentage of number 2 is 16%.
• The percentage of number 3 is 13%.
• The percentage of number 4 is 8%.
• The percentage of number 5 is 9%.
• The percentage of number 6 is 7%.
• The percentage of number 7 is 6%.
• The percentage of number 8 is 5%.
• The percentage of number 9 is 4%.

I'm really concerned about the numbers 4 and 5; however, I think this election is the articulate election because it follows Benford's law.

In the case of the 2017 House of Representatives election Tokyo single-member constituency.

• The percentage of number 1 is 30%.
• The percentage of number 2 is 17%.
• The percentage of number 3 is 13%.
• The percentage of number 4 is 11%.
• The percentage of number 5 is 10%.
• The percentage of number 6 is 8%.
• The percentage of number 7 is 6%.
• The percentage of number 8 is 2%.
• The percentage of number 9 is 3%.

The numbers 5,6, and 8 are quite different from Benford's line. Someone might have modified the result of this election. Japanese elections tend to be clean and accurate. The seriousness of the Japanese people might be making elections accurate.

The Investigation of the US Election in 2000, 2016, and 2020. 

In the case of the 2000 US Election. 

The first part is the case of the 2000 US election that George Bush and Al Gore fought each other. 

• The percentage of number 1 is 28%.
• The percentage of number 2 is 19%.
• The percentage of number 3 is 17%.
• The percentage of number 4 is 10%.
• The percentage of number 5 is 8%.
• The percentage of number 6 is 5%.
• The percentage of number 7 is 5%.
• The percentage of number 8 is 2%.
• The percentage of number 9 is 4%.

All numbers are quite different from Benford's law. I'm not really sure if one committed cheating or both of them cheated during this election because this graph is altogether with George Bush and Al Gore.

In the case of the 2016 US Presidential Election.

In the case of the Perrenial Candidate.

The first one is the perennial candidate.

• The percentage of number 1 is 31%.
• The percentage of number 2 is 18%.
• The percentage of number 3 is 12%.
• The percentage of number 4 is 9%.
• The percentage of number 5 is 8%.
• The percentage of number 6 is 5%.
• The percentage of number 7 is 8%.
• The percentage of number 8 is 5%.
• The percentage of number 9 is 5%.

I'm really concerned about the numbers 6 and 7; however, it is better than the US 2000 presidential election. 

In the case of Trump and Hillary.

• The percentage of number 1 is 38%.
• The percentage of number 2 is 20%.
• The percentage of number 3 is 10%.
• The percentage of number 4 is 11%.
• The percentage of number 5 is 4%.
• The percentage of number 6 is 5%.
• The percentage of number 7 is 4%.
• The percentage of number 8 is 5%.
• The percentage of number 9 is 4%.

It is different from the perennial candidate since the number 1 appears as the leading significant digit 38% of the time. Also, the other numbers are different from Benford's law. The Graph for the perennial candidate was better than the graph for Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton because the perennial candidate won't win anyway, and it doesn't need to spend some money on fraud and elect them. 

In the case of the 2020 Presidential Election.

Let's compare each graph because they are separate graphs. The first one is the graph for Donald Trump.

In the case of the Graph for Donald Trump.

 

This part is the case of the graph for Donald Trump. I'm going to analyze each percentage of numbers with my eyes by watching the movie in my blog since there are no specific percentages of numbers for Donald Trump and Joe Biden in the referenced materials. I'd appreciate it if you understand the reason. I'm going to add the word "about" to the percentages for each number.

• The percentage of number 1 is about 31% of the time.
• The percentage of number 2 is about 22% of the time.
• The percentage of number 3 is about 15% of the time.
• The percentage of number 4 is about 9% of the time.
• The percentage of number 5 is about 5% of the time.
• The percentage of number 6 is about 5% of the time.
• The percentage of number 7 is about 4% of the time.
• The percentage of number 8 is about 3% of the time.
• The percentage of number 9 is about 4% of the time.

Gold Well Walks. applied the graph because the only graph was presented. All numbers in this graph are different from Benford's law; however, it is better than the previous election. 

In the case of the Graph for Joe Biden.

His graph is the worst. It is fine to go to 8:00 minutes. 

• The percentage of number 1 is about 18% of the time.
• The percentage of number 2 is about 5% of the time.
• The percentage of number 3 is about 15% of the time.
• The percentage of number 4 is about 17% of the time.
• The percentage of number 5 is about 19% of the time.
• The percentage of number 6 is about 15% of the time.
• The percentage of number 7 is about 8% of the time.
• The percentage of number 8 is about 8% of the time.
• The percentage of number 9 is about 3% of the time.

All numbers are different from Benford's law. It might be the first time to see a graph that is so offset in the history of the election, isn't it? It is too worst. 

The-Navarro-Report-Vol-I-II-III-Feb-2-2021.pdf (thethinkingconservative.com)

Conclusion and Suggestion.

That's all about this blog. Benford's law can make sure if there is voter fraud in the election or not. You might be able to investigate the truth survey of the Chinese population by using it. The difference between the Japanese elections and the US presidential elections is that the Japanese elections are sports since they tend to follow Benford's law. In addition, Japanese people are very clear and serious and follow judicial laws. Compared to the US presidential elections, they are like a war because the presidential candidates tend to commit fraud during the elections to be the leader in the World. From the knowledge of the world, it is natural to have much cheating every election since the presidential candidates are doing anything to win; however, Biden's graph is too terrible. If Joe Biden should be the US president, the US Democratic party might be committing the same things as the 2020 US president. Unless the US fixes cheating, democracy in the US might be dead. For the future election, I highly recommend the US congress make sure if there is voter fraud or not by using Benford's law to treat the US presidential election as sports instead of war!! If a candidate should be committing cheating, the US congress punishes him or her strictly. I'd appreciate it if you send a comment to my account on Blogger or Facebook to make sure if you can watch the movie on my blog or not and spread my blog out around the world. See you next time!! 

Kamala Harris Is Wrong to Be the US President!!

A writer by Tommy Black Crow

Hi. This is Tommy Black Crow. This blog is about Kamala Harris's political policy. I'd appreciate it if you understand and study her policy because many American people support Donald Trump; however, I'd like to analyze her political policy. Do you mind if I explain and analyze her policy? These days, many mass media claim that Joe Biden is the next US president and she is the next vice president; however, Donald Trump still claims that the 2020 US presidential election is voter fraud. Currently, I believe in Donald Trump since Kamala Harris doesn't resign from the senator yet. In other words, If Joe Biden is the next US president, she should have quit senator already!! Unless Kamala Harris resigns as a senator, the mass media still broadcasts fake news in a row. Regardless of the detail, you can check "Is It Risky to Elect Donald Trump or Joe Biden for the US President with Mail-In Ballot?" which is one of my blogs. 

Tomoyuki Aso's Blog: Is It Risky to Elect Donald Trump or Joe Biden for the US President with Mail-In Ballot? (asotomoyuki.blogspot.com) 

Introduction of Kamala Harris

Before we are going to move on to the main paragraph, I'm going to introduce Kamala Harris since I'd like to know about her. Kamala Harris is one of the US senators. She was born in Oakland, California in 1964. She graduated from Howard University in 1986 together with political science and economics degree. Originally, she was the prosecutor in California and was in charge of homicide, burglary, robbery, and sexual assault after her graduation from Howard University. Kamala Harris ran for District Attorney of San Francisco in 2002 to be involved in protection from crimes. She contributed to the protection from violent crimes, performing the death penalty, and participating in the truancy initiative program from 2004 to 2011. Kamala Harris ran for General Attorney of California in 2010 to improve the law, consumer rights, LGBT rights, and sex crimes. Then, she became the US senator in 2017 to improve the law in the US. Finally, she is going to be the US vice president if Joe Biden should be the US president. 

Analyzation of Her Political Policy

Kamala Harris decided to legalize drugs and prostitution. If she should be legalizing these laws, Illegal immigrants would be founding gangsters, and there would be gangsters in the entire US since Joe Biden plans to remove the national border wall, accept illegal immigrants, and decrease the budget for the police organization. I have proof. Before I'm going to show the evidence, let me ask you a question. Have you ever watched a movie which is called "Gangster Squad"? Josh Brolin and Emma Stone know this movie because they were in this movie. Mickey Cohen who was the gang boss in Los Angeles and became the most powerful criminal king tried to expand his criminal enterprise to Chicago and New York from 1940 to 1950, as a result, he was under arrest in 1949 by five brave police officers including John O'Mara, Jerry Wooters, and Coleman Harris among them. Indeed, this movie was inspired by a true story. Therefore, Mickey Cohen existed in the US and acquired a police chief in Sacramento, mayor, and even politicians in California. In the case of the 2020 presidential election, Joe Biden is Mickey Cohen. Donald Trump is John O'Mara. Rudy Giuliani is Max Kennard. Lin Wood is Jerry Wooters. the corrupt democratic politicians and the corrupt states including Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, and so on are the same as the acquired police chief, mayors, and governor in Los Angeles by Mickey Cohen. As if we watched Gangster Squad. Americans also should watch Beyond Scared Straight because the part of teenagers who have participated in the Beyond Scared Straight program worked for the gangster to earn their money by selling drugs and doing prostitution. It is possible that the number of teenagers who are going to be addicted to drugs, violence, stealing, and so on because drugs import to the US from the national border between Mexico and the US.

Gangster Squad (film) - Wikipedia

Conclusion

That is all about this blog. Drugs make people go the wrong way and lead to murder and violence. Mickey Cohen got the biggest crime business with drugs, prostitution, and violence and killed opponents. He corrupted the police and government organization in Los Angeles. Gang Squad is the movie in which if Kamala Harris is going to be the US president. I'm going to give you a suggestion. Why don't you impeach Kamala Harris before she is going to be the US president? I'd appreciate it if you read my blog and register for my account on Facebook. Happy New Year!!