By Tommy Aso.
Time to Make a Discussion of This.
Michael Sussman's trial ended three weeks ago. He is innocent despite FBI agents witnessed that Hillary Clinton and her campaign were involved in Russian Gate and ordered Mainstream Media to report that Donald Trump was connected to a Russian bank during the 2016 US Presidential Election; however, it was a fake story that was created by the Hillary campaign.
I. Introduction of Russia Gate and Michael Sussman's Trial
A. Russia Gate
Russia Gate was that the Russian Government interfered in the 2016 US Presidential Election with the goals of harming the campaign of Hillary Clinton to boost the candidacy of Donald Trump and increase political and social discord in the United States. Then, Donald Trump was impeached, but it was exposed that Russian Gate was a hoax that was manufactured by the Clinton campaign by the FBI.
B. Michael Sussman's Trial
Michael Sussman is a trial that was charged with making a false statement to the FBI in September 2016 when he said he was not working on behalf of any client when he brought information alleging a covert communications channel between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank, but he found not guilty despite FBI agents witnessed that Hillary Clinton and her campaign were involved in Russian Gate and ordered Mainstream Media to report that Donald Trump was connected to a Russian bank during the 2016 US Presidential Election.
II. The Word about Michael Sussman's Trial.
This is the main paragraph of this blog. This movie is about if AI is in charge of a trial for a murder incident that occurred by a 26 years old woman. The word about Michael Sussman's trial is that the US Raw Enforcement should consider introducing the AI trial because Washington DC is the supportive state of the US Democrat Party and the judge and juries are related to Michael Sussman and the US Democratic Party, have donated to Hillary Clinton and other the US Democrats, and one of the chosen juries was anti-Trump. Therefore, Sussman's trial isn't fair and equal at all and this trial had an advantage for the US Democratic Party too much. AI trial is a trial system in that AI is in charge of judges and juries and is performed by AI.
In addition, George Lowery who was the Cornell Chronicle’s managing editor shows that jurors tend to judge a suspect's looks. Therefore, Psycho-legal literature reported for decades that juries tend to show a bias in favor of good-looking defendants and there's a difference between good-looking defendants and ugly-looking defendants when it comes to issuing a verdict. Then, it's not fair and equal to hand down a verdict with a defendant's looks and attractiveness. I highly recommend that the US government introduces an AI trial to erase unfairness and inequality when it comes to issuing a verdict on a defendant's looks and attractiveness.
